graph: POST-CAPITALISM
< STUB+ >
Revisions:
201908xx moved out from 🔗graph-postapple
201908xx CURRENTLY FUCKED UP:
drunken unfinished sketching involves "COMMUNISM IS BAD TOO" argumentcap
20190923 adding "dramaturgy" of the argument
¶DRAMATURGY OF OPPOSITION
:
* economic system = how production & distribution is guided
* capitalism:
production by individual incentive, risk, etc ... reaping rewards or "busting"
distribution via arbitrary compensation ("money"), mediated by worker unionization, then "consuming" on a market with prices fixed by shops
* socialism:
there is no such thing as a generic socialism !
---------------
how to explain this?
"capitalism (at least laissez faire) and also anarchism (in the general sense if not overloaded, of course SANS previous positioning) means opening the doors and seeing what happens"
"...these are both "FREE" systems, but "FREE" is a naive position..."
"socialism means opening the doors and having some specific way of guiding it"
* yugoslavian self-management socialism:
production guided by worker
* communism:
there is no such thing as a specified communist system !!! (??? >expert)
* "the left is unrealistic" - what do you mean by the left?:
* "... but china is state socialist", or even "fascist" ?:
dude ..... just ........
todo !!!
* there is also #endofwork :
no more work = no more wages
what now? UBI?
money comes from what?
who gets to claim the factories? do they get passed on?
how would anyone "compete" with them?
is there any reason to remove "work" but then still "gamble"?
what is the reason for the need for incentive? did we ever decide that "progress" is something we all strive for??? :
!!! keep going in this direction
* [...] CONTINUE !!!!!!
:
* economic system = how production & distribution is guided
* capitalism:
production by individual incentive, risk, etc ... reaping rewards or "busting"
distribution via arbitrary compensation ("money"), mediated by worker unionization, then "consuming" on a market with prices fixed by shops
* socialism:
there is no such thing as a generic socialism !
---------------
how to explain this?
"capitalism (at least laissez faire) and also anarchism (in the general sense if not overloaded, of course SANS previous positioning) means opening the doors and seeing what happens"
"...these are both "FREE" systems, but "FREE" is a naive position..."
"socialism means opening the doors and having some specific way of guiding it"
* yugoslavian self-management socialism:
production guided by worker
* communism:
there is no such thing as a specified communist system !!! (??? >expert)
* "the left is unrealistic" - what do you mean by the left?:
* "... but china is state socialist", or even "fascist" ?:
dude ..... just ........
todo !!!
* there is also #endofwork :
no more work = no more wages
what now? UBI?
money comes from what?
who gets to claim the factories? do they get passed on?
how would anyone "compete" with them?
is there any reason to remove "work" but then still "gamble"?
what is the reason for the need for incentive? did we ever decide that "progress" is something we all strive for??? :
* [...] CONTINUE !!!!!!